Exam 2 Flashcards | Chegg.com ~ Legacy News

Athletics is often a powerful change agent. It plays a significant role in schools across the country and benefits communities in many ways. B.Ed., Elementary Education, Oklahoma State University. Derrick Meador, M.Ed., is the superintendent for Jennings Public Schools in Oklahoma.The "power" schools during the initial collegiate athletic contests were the. Which of the following statements is NOT accurate in describing Division I, Division II, and Division III athletic departments, according to current NCAA standards?The "power" schools during the initial collegiate athletic contests. This person working for a Division III athletic deparment is responsible for press releases, game day stats, website management, and social media.The "power" schools during the initial collegiate athletic contests were the D) major: provides a school with an extensive recruiting or competitive advantage; secondary: provides a minimal recruiting or competitive advantage and may be inadvertent or isolated in nature.The "Power" Schools during the initial collegiate athletic contests were The USOC is the organization mandated by Congress under the Amateur Sports Act of 1978 to do which of the following: A) Govern activities of the United States related to the Olympics, Paralympics, and the Pan Am Games.

Chapter 8 Flashcards | Quizlet

Despite the increase in organization, administrators initially were not eager, generally speaking, to Indicative of the administrative outrage at such elaborate contests was the telegram that the By 1900 the popularity of collegiate sports was reflected by its adoption in even all-girls schools. Additionally, the power and popularity of intercollegiate athletics led directly to conspicuous abuse.The "power" schools during the initial collegiate athletic contests were the. What has been the most prevailing issue affecting collegiate athletic departments over the past couple of decades?Students are permitted to participate in non-collegiate competition during the 12-month period after high school graduation. National Junior College Athletic Association National Federation of State High School Associations Join us on Facebook. Spelling Power 11th TE.pdf. Uploaded by.

History of Intercollegiate Athletics Jeopardy Template

0 When the Presidents Commission initially was formed it was not given. veto power over NCAA of the athletic program, although the team managers controlled the scheduling of contests and the purse strings. 23. It has been chronicled that during the latter part of the nineteenth century: Hogan [a...College athletes have the power to bring their community together and generate more revenue for their school during their…show more content… This is possible because the 20-hour rule has its loopholes. According to the NCAA, game days count as three out of the 20 hours for the week, but it...The Ivy League includes 8 private tertiary education institutions located in the Northeast of the United States. These are Brown University, Harvard University, Columbia University, Princeton University, University of Pennsylvania, Dartmouth College, Yale University, and Cornell University.An Emory University law school professor was placed on administrative leave for more than a year A glance at their treatment of embryology, biological sex, or nuclear power is proof enough of that. Blockchain is perhaps best known as being the way in which cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin and...

Intercollegiate athletics in the United States has come to be thought to be upper training's "peculiar institution." This somewhat vital characterization effects from the incontrovertible fact that despite the fact that intercollegiate athletics is seldom indexed as part of the central undertaking of a college or college, athletics have come to command inordinate visibility, resources, affect, and attention both outside and inside many campuses. Analyzing, explaining, and dealing with this disparity between legit philosophy and exact observe items a fancy analytic activity. To actually understand the present situation requires a reconstruction of college athletics' unique historical evolution.

Visitors to an American campus can't help however be struck by way of the bodily presence of the intercollegiate athletics enterprise. In the twenty-first century, it's not bizarre for a big college campus to contain each a football stadium that seats 70,000 spectators and a basketball enviornment that incorporates audiences of 20,000. In the 12 months 2000 many universities had annual working budgets for athletics ranging between million and million. The luck and pervasiveness of school sports described was not inevitable, however is the result of explicit innovations and episodes over the past One hundred fifty years.

The Violent Birth of Intercollegiate Sports

Prior to 1850 intercollegiate sports activities performed a marginal function in collegiate existence. If there was a necessity for bodily task in the student routine, school presidents and deans concept manual exertions in the form of farming or clearing boulders from school lands have compatibility the invoice perfectly. Though admittedly both economical and expedient, students, now not surprisingly, remained unconvinced that this was once the type of physical unencumber that their souls craved. Instead, collegiate scholar bodies increasingly more devised their own elaborate (and regularly brutal) intramural contests referred to as "class rushes." These "rushes" usually involved some variation of football, which if truth be told provided a pretext for a ritualistic and violent hazing of the incoming freshman by the sophomore magnificence.

College officers struggled to curb those violent scholar traditions, however intramural sports persevered inside of the campus and eventually took a decisive flip toward sanctioned and refereed events wherein a team representing one establishment competed in opposition to its counterpart from another. Despite the build up in organization, directors to begin with were no longer eager, usually speaking, to embody such contests that they viewed as irrelevant distractions from serious scholarly paintings. Indicative of the administrative outrage at such elaborate contests used to be the telegram that the president of Cornell sent to officers at the University of Michigan in 1873 when he discovered that scholar groups from the two establishments were making plans to satisfy in Cleveland for a football recreation: "I will not permit thirty men to travel four hundred miles merely to agitate a bag of wind" (Rudolph, p. 374–375).

Whether or not Cornell's president gained this actual struggle, he and faculty presidents elsewhere lost the battle of curtailing intercollegiate athletic contests. With or with out administrative blessings, college scholars formed athletic associations that included mechanisms for raising cash, charging fees, sponsoring occasions, and selling tickets. And, by way of the 1890s, at many faculties, alumni groups joined with the student organizations to create formidable techniques over which the college presidents and school exercised quite little control.

Though faculty athletics would temporarily be ruled by way of positive sports activities and through powerful establishments, the remarkable characteristic of college athletics in the overdue 19th and early 20th centuries was its pervasiveness and variety throughout American establishments. Although the oldest and largest establishments–Harvard and Yale–briefly gained the most consideration in newspaper coverage and provided the greatest athletic budgets, numerous different campuses made significant contributions as effectively. For instance, Springfield College in western Massachusetts, firstly referred to as the International YMCA Training School, was where James Naismith invented basketball in 1891. Nearby, Amherst College initiated varsity baseball and integrated calisthenics and physical fitness into the collegiate curriculum. By 1900 the approval for collegiate sports activities used to be reflected by its adoption in even all-girls schools. Wellesley College, as an example, acquired renown for having developed a distinctively female way to such sports activities as group, basketball, and bodily health. Other examples of inventions in American school sports earlier than the flip of the twentieth century include:

First intercollegiate staff regatta (Harvard vs. Yale): 1852 First intercollegiate baseball (generic term) (Williams vs. Amherst): 1859 First intercollegiate soccer association (Harvard-Yale-Princeton): 1872 First intercollegiate track and box affiliation (Intercollegiate Association of Amateur Athletics of America, or IC4A): 1875 First intercollegiate tennis fit: 1883 First intercollegiate ice hockey game (Harvard vs. Brown): 1895 First intercollegiate gymnastics festival: 1899 The Maturing of a Collegiate Way of Life

As American upper schooling itself was once in large part nurtured in the Northeast, likewise in sports, this area additionally led the way in developing the intercollegiate sports activities that now seem so acquainted. Heading into a brand new century, Yale ruled soccer and in addition got here to be known as the "cradle of coaches" as it spread the Yale soccer gospel of strategy and sportsmanship throughout the country. By 1910 Harvard got the nationwide championship in football and asserted itself in a lot of other sports activities. Harvard would also set the pace when it comes to spectator facilities with the construction, in 1904, of Soldiers' Field–regarded as the greatest, greatest instance of strengthened concrete structure in the duration. This regional predilection for architectural and spectator growth persevered when the Yale Bowl opened in 1914 with a grand design and a seating capacity of greater than 70,000.

Although the eastern seaboard colleges initiated faculty sports, their fashions and classes quickly were emulated in areas throughout the country. In the mid-nineteenth century, faculty representatives from Midwestern universities formed the Western Conference–a proper team popularly recognized then and now as the Big Ten Conference. Within that conference, the universities of Michigan and Chicago set the tempo with spectator enchantment and winning groups.

The young University of Chicago used to be especially vital as a leader in the structure and control of a prime powered varsity sports program. Whereas many presidents had resisted and resented the ascent of intercollegiate athletics, the University of Chicago's administration embraced college sports activities. Chicago's younger, brash president, William Rainey Harper, noticed the athletic contests as a possibility to attach the campus to the better community and thereby generate goodwill, profit, and attention for his style establishment. The creation of a large stadium combined with a mass advertising effort that succeeded in generating common appeal and big ticket sales. Harper discovered the preferrred partner to help him carry out his brave new vision of commercialized collegiate athletics in Amos Alonzo Stagg. As coach and athletic director, Stagg, a Yale graduate and storied football hero, oversaw the University of Chicago's athletic division for 40 years.

The significance of Stagg's tenure in athletics at Chicago lies in the undeniable fact that he (with the president and board's enhance) created a structure that gave considerable autonomy and affect to the athletic division within the most often complicated and Byzantine university administrative structure. Though maintaining college standing, Stagg's program funds used to be exempted from typical bureaucratic procedures. He reported immediately to the president and the board of trustees, and not using a oversight from academic deans or faculty budget committees. In addition, Stagg generated further source of revenue for himself and his program through being allowed to make use of the college amenities to sponsor promotional occasions, host state highschool track meets, and cling tutorial camps. Such a situation made Stagg and his department the envy of alternative athletic leaders who in turn pushed their own establishments to undertake identical procedures so as to create the winning methods that alumni and donors demanded.

New England faculties also played a crucial role in the evolution of administration and control of college sports. Harvard's hiring of Bill Reid as a well-paid, full-time soccer coach in 1901 represented a big escalation of professionalizing faculty coaches. After Reid's hiring, coaches across the nation learned that if they gained they too may demand the top salary and considerable benefits loved by means of Harvard's head coach. During his long tenure at Yale as athletic director, Walter Camp apparently perfected the financial and political control of a whole athletic program with little responsibility to scholars, faculty, or instructional management. Camp extensively utilized his Yale place as the base from which to create an enterprising community of syndicated newspaper columns, annual guides, endorsements, and other lucrative, influential college sports activities publications.

The turn of the century didn't mark merely heady days for the burgeoning athletic methods. Many students and a few alumni resented that the rising organizational scheme tended to offer inordinate and enduring toughen to a few decided on spectator (and therefore revenue-generating) sports–namely, soccer–with fairly few resources being dedicated to a lot of different varsity squads. Additionally, the energy and recognition of intercollegiate athletics led immediately to conspicuous abuse. Even at this early juncture, a loss of regulation and honest play both off and on the field left school athletics indelibly marked by way of corruption and a name that has plagued "big-time" school sports to at the moment. More significantly, as the video games "professionalized," brutality continuously increased. At times, it appeared that the days of Roman crowds chanting for gladiatorial blood were returning.

At the flip of the century, the scenario had deteriorated to the point that President Theodore Roosevelt summoned university presidents to the White House with an ultimatum that they do away with brutality from the playing field or possibility federal intervention. The violence did decrease, and the construction of higher protective equipment also aided in safeguarding the athletes, however the problems were far from solved. No requirements were set in spaces similar to eligibility and scholarships, thereby blurring the line of definition for supposedly newbie contests between scholars. In an try to deliver order to those an increasing number of standard competitions, the National Collegiate Athletic Association was formed in the early 1900s. This may best be considered a Pyrrhic victory, then again, for the ancient East Coast universities, which had the strongest athletic systems in the country, refused to cooperate and boycotted the organizational assembly with institutions from the Midwest and West. Consequently, intercollegiate athletics lacked any semblance of meaningful nation-wide coordination over the subsequent part century.

Athletics Out West

As Frederick Jackson Turner postulated for the complete country: Though born and raised in the East, Americans and their institutions are ultimately outlined and refined in the West. Collegiate athletics definitely followed Turner's thesis as the upward thrust of spectator and pupil pastime in school sports unfold to the Pacific Coast. Between World War I and World War II the geographical steadiness of energy in dominance of college sports activities shifted. The June 1937 factor of Life magazine dedicated to "going to college in America" incorporated a characteristic article titled, "Sports Records Move West." The emergence of best caliber intercollegiate groups in the Midwest and on the Pacific Coast "left Eastern collegians clinging to a steadily dwindling share of athletic supremacy." This led the editors to observe that: "In the past two decades, athletic reputation has largely moved West and South" (Life, p. 72–73).

Increasingly, college sports activities became a symbolic litmus take a look at of regional and/or ethnic esteem and assimilation. For example, in the Nineteen Twenties in South Bend, Indiana, the University of Notre Dame gained national visibility by means of turning into a rallying level for American Catholic delight and association. Its victories over established East Coast soccer groups and national symbols akin to West Point supplied American Catholics with a way of feat and belonging. This pattern continued effectively into the Sixties, as an example, when African Americans used sports activities to damage colour limitations, specifically in southern universities. The nationwide basketball championship gained by way of Texas Western in 1966 with an all-black starting five–over the perennially tough University of Kentucky and its all-white squad–marked a very powerful shift in recruitment and acceptance of black players.

Various regions of the nation have additionally rallied round college sports systems. Since 1926 the annual intersectional contests between Notre Dame and the University of Southern California often attracted crowds of over 100,000, whether played in Los Angeles or Chicago, and provided victorious areas the enjoyment of martial bragging rights with out the sacrifice of exact army fight. Starting in 1946 the annual New Year's Day Rose Bowl Game matched the champion of the Midwest's Big Ten Conference against the championship team from the Pacific Coast Conference–and thus equipped victorious areas the delight in martial bragging rights without the sacrifice of tangible military fight. Tiny schools and forgotten areas may just gain instant, if fleeting, nationwide attention by effectively competing with national powers, such as when unheralded Centre College of Kentucky gained national headlines in the Twenties for spirited play–and an eventual victory–over Harvard's soccer squad in 1921. Finally, as with the rest that has mass appeal, politicians endeared themselves to the electorate through associating with and supporting local schools. Perhaps the grandest instance of such actions came about when Huey Long, the indefatigable governor of Louisiana, pronounced in 1928 that Louisiana State University was once the "People's University," and called on the other folks of the state to share in its wealth of championship groups and its magnificent soccer stadium.

From Chaos to Concern

Colleges and universities paid an expensive worth for the popularity of intercollegiate athletics. The robust, pervasive, and enduring enchantment of varsity groups, blended with the quest through alumni, local boosters, and faculty officials for championship squads, meant that even via the Nineteen Twenties the activities related to recruiting and compensating college scholar athletes were in large part unregulated chaos. This used to be most dramatically uncovered in 1929 when the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching launched its complete learn about American College Athletics, written by means of Howard Savage. According to this report, significant reform in American collegiate sports activities may just happen provided that campus presidents changed the "downtown crowd," comprising a town's businessmen, alumni boosters, and commercial interests, as the source of management and duty. The initial reaction of college presidents was outrage and denial, but if the Carnegie Foundation stood by its allegations and released more documentation, educational leaders confirmed some public signs of passion in reform. Shoring up conferences by means of including regulations and a commissioner used to be one gesture. Ironically, convention reforms were incessantly counterproductive because they merely gave legitimate approval to such practices as training tables that equipped college players with loose meals day by day, together with subsidies for athletes, and alliances with booster clubs that in the past have been cited as the issues of unregulated school sports.

Immediately after World War II, the unresolved excesses of intercollegiate athletics won remarkable publicity. Returning armed-service veterans swelled the ranks of varsity athletics squads. Many presidents and athletic administrators positioned no restrictions on the choice of athletic scholarships allowed, and some soccer squads included three hundred players for opening practice, with a couple of hundred athletes on scholarship. Excesses were accompanied by way of illegalities. Between 1948 and 1952 exposés and successful prosecutions of student-athletes, coaches, and alumni boosters all for point-shaving schemes and playing cartels ended in congressional hearings and a call for nationwide oversight by educational leaders. When organizations led by college presidents, such as the American Council on Education, failed to give a coherent plan, regulatory power was once given to the National Collegiate Athletics Association–a company whose number one fee had up to now been to simply advertise championship tournaments. Meanwhile, at the convention stage, presidents and faculty delegates tried to introduce standards of student habits and eligibility into policies and practices. If New England colleges have been pioneers in the creation and growth of school sports in the first half of the century, after World War II they again assumed a leadership role in the reform and removal of excess. Most noticeable were the codes and restraints demonstrated by way of the "Little Three"–Amherst, Williams, and Wesleyan. In 1956 the formal advent of the Ivy Group (League) equipped a model of presidential and school oversight of school sports activities.

The economics of intercollegiate athletics was once slowly but consistently altered in the 1950s because of the simultaneous appearance of two phenomena: (1) skilled sports groups in football and basketball, and (2) the availability of radio and television for are living declares of sporting occasions. All school groups, ranging from the established powerful university squads to the small faculty groups, feared that the acclaim for the National Football League and the National Basketball Association would cause declining attendance at school video games. Small faculty squads faced a 2d risk: nationwide and regional broadcasts of a couple of selected "big-time" faculty games brought about many long-time fanatics to stick at house rather than purchase a stadium price ticket on Saturday afternoons. The consequence was a shake-out in faculty sports activities systems over twenty years through which a considerable collection of institutions opted, or were financially pressured, to drop soccer.

College Sports in the Age of Aquarius

In the overdue Sixties shifting cultural values forced standard adjustments in sports activities policies and emphases. As other athletes demanded equality, granting athletic scholarships ceased to be confined to a handful of conventional revenue sports activities–specifically, football and basketball. By 1970 athletic grants-in-aid were increasingly more prevalent for such sports activities as track, football, lacrosse, hockey, wrestling, baseball, and swimming. Expanding the excellence and the number of squads tended to swell athletic division running expenses, but the small fan base of those sports activities failed to cover the greater costs. Consequently, institutes of upper finding out faced growing philosophical and financial issues inside of their athletic methods. The monetary brinkmanship would be subjected to even higher–and unexpected–pressure in the 1970s.

Much extra vocally and powerfully than "minor" sports activities athletes, women increasingly more sought equal treatment from institutions with reference to athletics. Their actions would lead to a dramatic trade in intercollegiate sports activities: the inclusion of ladies as bona fide participants in varsity athletics. The Association for Intercollegiate Athletics for Women (AIAW), created in the Nineteen Fifties, led the way in increasing monetary beef up of feminine athletic techniques and scholarships for women. This too placed institutions and athletic departments in dire monetary straits, for female sports didn't generate enough fan interest to be self-supporting. This largely become a moot point in 1972, alternatively, because of the landmark Title IX regulation that prohibited, with some exceptions, discrimination by means of gender in provision of tutorial programs. Consequently, college athletics in some ways moved from the enjoying fields to the court rooms as folks challenged institutional compliance with this federal mandate. Between 1972 and 1990 colleges and courts groped for a clear interpretation of exactly what used to be supposed and required in terms of social justice and institutional compliance for girls as student-athletes. In 1997 the Supreme Court upheld decrease court docket rulings requiring Brown University to conform to Title IX tips on proportionality.

Originally, a faculty may just demonstrate compliance in athletics in one among four tactics: have a proportional number of female and male participants; have a proportional dating between female athletes and feminine scholars; display increasing opportunity for women folk to take part in athletics; or display that female participation in athletics matched their passion and talent to participate. However, most subsequent court rulings have demanded that the most stringent of the four assessments be met, insisting that schools have a proportional collection of contributors in men's and ladies's athletics and thereby a proportional choice of scholarships for every gender. This rigorous interpretation of directives for compliance with Title IX legislation has proven tricky for institutions because of the disparity of source of revenue and female and male sports activities generate. For instance, many athletic departments depend on soccer to fund their whole working budgets, but fielding a soccer staff requires offering scholarships for more than sixty male scholars. Therefore, underneath Title IX directives, more than sixty feminine scholars will have to even be given athletic scholarships, which then requires athletic departments to create enough female sports to field sixty individuals with the wisdom that these actions will not garner enough fan give a boost to to pay for their existence. Consequently, athletic directors nationwide have eliminated many non-revenue male sports activities, with the declare that athletics programs can now not manage to pay for to fund them. The corollary is that athletic directors have viable possible choices to eliminating men's teams akin to wrestling and swimming. The net result of these conflicting interpretations is that many intercollegiate athletics programs are held in suspense on their personality and composition. Though difficult, failure to agree to Title IX directives can bring harsh and far-reaching repercussions; subsequently instructional leaders and athletic administrators continue to review their intercollegiate athletic enterprise to ensure that women are equally represented.

Competing in a Brave New Century of Sport

The most conspicuous example of the problems of success and popularity that confronted intercollegiate athletics in the late twentieth century may also be observed in the 1991 and 2001 reform reviews of the Knight Foundation Commission on the Future of Intercollegiate Athletics. The absence of a government company, mixed with the limits of such voluntary associations as the National Collegiate Athletic Association to convey integrity to the governance of college sports, has induced foundations to take the lead in selling public dialogue of the problems and issues. In 1991 the Knight Foundation panel, ruled by way of college presidents along with some executives and legislators, proposed that sturdy presidential involvement used to be the key to protective the interests of student-athletes. A decade later, the emphasis was on cost containment as the essential factor in curbing the commercialism of intercollegiate sports activities. Whether or no longer such reforms have a popular and enduring influence, intercollegiate athletics persist, for better or worse (or each), as a distinctive a part of American upper schooling.

By the Nineteen Nineties discussions about student-athletes had shifted from the query, "Are college athletics being paid?" to the proposition, "How much should college athletes be paid?" Such debates followed logically from research by way of economists who concluded that the National Collegiate Athletic Association had turn out to be a extremely profitable cartel, and that athletes collaborating in big-time methods were, in essence, regularly being exploited by their establishments and associations as "unpaid professionals." Furthermore, coaches in top profile sports activities enhanced their stature as celebrities moderately than as educators, entire with endorsements and special contracts to complement their base salaries. To build up the seriousness of these issues, athletic systems in any respect institutions, together with the most conspicuous ones, confronted a paradox of prosperity: despite extraordinary revenues, maximum groups and programs were not financially self-supporting. Even at the Division IA degree of NCAA competition, future funding of intercollegiate athletics confronted a scenario of dubious fiscal health.

The conventional wisdom was once that overemphasis on intercollegiate athletics used to be maximum prevalent in the reasonably small selection of big-time programs at huge universities. Yet vital, systematic research sponsored by way of the Mellon Foundation in 2000 instructed another way. William G. Bowen and James Shulman's learn about, The Game of Life: College Sports and Educational Values, difficult the profile with their discovering that even at–or, perhaps, especially at–academically selective and relatively small-sized faculties and universities, the demands on student-athletes' time were considerable. Furthermore, at those institutions, most often regarded as with the exception of athletic extra, commitment to strong varsity sports programs tended to exert inordinate affect on such decisions as admissions and allocation of campus assets. Academic and public concern over the correct place of athletics in American schools and universities remained problematic at most establishments at the get started of the twenty-first century.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

ATWELL, ROBERT H.; GRIMES, BRUCE; and LOPIANO, DONNA A. 1980. The Money Game: Financing Collegiate Athletics. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

FLEISHER, ARTHUR A., III; GOFF, BRIAN L.; and TOLLISON, ROBERT D. 1991. The National Collegiate Athletic Association: A Study in Cartel Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

LAWRENCE, PAUL R. 1987. Unsportsmanlike Conduct: The National Collegiate Athletic Association and the Business of College Football. New York:Praeger.

LESTER, ROBIN. 1995. Stagg's University: The Rise, Decline, and Fall of Big-Time Football at Chicago. Champaign-Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

MICHENER, JAMES. 1976. Sports in America. New York: Random House.

ORIARD, MICHAEL. 1993. Reading Football: How the Popular Press Created an American Spectacle . Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

RUDOLPH, FREDERICK. 1962. "The Rise of Football." In The American College and University: A History. New York: Knopf.

SHULMAN, JAMES L., and BOWEN, WILLIAM G. 2000. The Game of Life: College Sports and Educational Values. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

SMITH, RONALD. 1988. Sports and Freedom: The Rise of Big-Time College Athletics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

SPERBER, MURRAY. 1990. College Sports, Inc.: The Athletic Department vs. The University. New York: Henry Holt.

SPERBER, MURRAY. 1999. Onward to Victory: The Crises That Shaped College Sports. New York: Henry Holt.

"Sports Records Move West." 1937. Life June 7, 72–73.

THELIN, JOHN R. 1994. Games Colleges Play: Scandal and Reform in Intercollegiate Athletics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

ZIMBALIST, ANDREW. 1999. Unpaid Professionals: Commercialism and Conflict in Big-Time College Sports. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.